Fervour.
In the on-camera eyes of James Brokenshire MP, Home Office
minister, Aneeta Prem, founder of anti-slavery charity Freedom, and Detective
Inspector Kevin Hyland, leading the 37-strong anti-trafficking unit of the
Metropolitan Police.
James and his Basil Brush hair; Aneeta of the permanently
raised right eyebrow; Kevin with his lower jaw pushed forward like the
Churchill insurance dog – and the same blue eyes as ‘ex-slave’ Josephine Herivel.
Despite their personal differences, when interviewed about the
three women freed from a South London ‘slave house’, James, Aneeta and Kevin displayed
identical levels of intensity.
Instead of releasing three women from the remains of a far
left sect, perhaps they’ve all been captured by a rival cult – the cult of
victimhood.
Imagine the instructions from the new Comrade Bala: look
intently at the interviewer. Don’t waiver, except when talking about your personal
contact with the three women (blessed are their names), at which point you may
allow a smile to flutter across your lips. If the interview is taking place in
an informal setting, e.g. breakfast TV, studio guests will remain pert and
alert to what you say.
Report to Central Committee, Cult of Victimhood. During
their interviews, James, Aneeta and Kevin waved key words from the little book
of bruises: shocked, relieved, psychological, traumatised. Aneeta, especially,
made full use of ‘traumatised’: the victims were traumatised in captivity; they
have been traumatised by current media coverage; my charity is careful to avoid
causing them further trauma. These
comrades have vindicated the socially progressive slogan: power grows from trauma discourse.
It’s not difficult to satirise the rituals of the cult of
victimhood, as performed on a screen near you. While the week wore on, the
'slave' story started to wear out. More people were working it out for themselves that
if this is slavery, Malcolm X must have been a WASP.
But there’s something else about this melodrama which satire
doesn’t do justice to: the pleading look, not in the eyes of the three women
(we haven’t been allowed to see them yet), but on the part of the zealots
themselves.
Something in their expression suggests they are only just
managing to hang on; and only just managing to hold on to the viewers. Looking
intently into the interviewers’ eyes, they seem to be saying: don’t leave me;
bring me back into the fold, please.
Less like the Red Guards of nearly 50 years ago (on their faces, the lustre of revolutionary zeal), in their anxiety to connect, only connect, the new zealots resemble
the parents, teachers and intellectuals who were excommunicated and/or executed
during Mao’s cultural cataclysm.
Even in their finest hour, today's cult-ists are bowed down
with anxiety. Whether they are fearful it could happen to them, or that
they will be found out, or found wanting – who knows?